← Practice Hub
GVPM
Illustrative Preview Prepared for Carlos Elizondo, MD Schedule Review →
Annual Operating Report · GV Practice Management

Elizondo Medical Group
five engines, one practice.

A full-year operating view of a five-location primary care group in South Texas — where revenue is made, where it leaks, where it accumulates, and what it is worth to the owner.

FY 2026
5 Locations · 7 Clinicians · 60 Staff
~38,400 Patient Visits Annually
~1,840 Attributed MA Lives
Annual Revenue
$7.04M
trailing 12 months · $586K avg monthly
Operating Margin
15%
13 pts below MGMA primary care median
Effective Hourly Rate
$108
owner take-home per working hour
Practice Valuation
$4.6M
at 4.4× normalized EBITDA · compressed
01
Earning

How the practice makes money.

Revenue is steady and growing at 2.4% YoY — healthy for an established group. The two Corpus clinics carry half the practice volume. Revenue is the input; everything downstream is the work.

$7.04M Annual2.4% YoY · Above trend
Annual Revenue
$7.04M
▲ 2.4% YoY · $586K avg monthly
Avg Revenue / Visit
$183
38,400 visits annually · ▲ 3.1% mix improvement
New Patient Inflow
1,248
~104 per month · Corpus carries 57% of growth
Top-3 Payer Concentration
68%
BCBS, UHC, Medicare Advantage
Monthly revenue · last twelve months
May 2025 → Apr 2026
Story

Revenue growth is real but modest — 2.4% YoY is the floor, not the ceiling. The two Corpus locations carry half the network; the outlying clinics carry the rest. Growing revenue matters less here than stopping the leaks in the next three engines.

02
Operating

Where the money goes.

A 15% operating margin is 13 points below the MGMA primary care median. Expenses are running heavy. Meaningful trim opportunity exists alongside the revenue capture story.

$6.00M OpEx85% of revenue · Heavy
Operating Expenses
$6.00M
85% of revenue · ~13 pts above benchmark ratio
Operating Margin
15%
−13 pts vs MGMA primary care median of 28%
Salaries & Benefits
52% of OpEx
$3.14M annual · staffing leverage opportunity
Net Operating Income
$1.04M
Before owner comp · $87K avg monthly
Operating expense breakdown · 10 categories
Annual $K
Story

Three lines worth auditing first: salaries scaling faster than visit volume, software sprawl in IT (↑ 100% in two years), and a growing other-operating line that hides miscellaneous spend. Cost discipline alone won’t solve this — it has to run alongside revenue capture.

03
Collection

What you collect of what you earn.

The gap between billed and collected is where the largest recoverable dollars live. EMG's collection cycle is functional — but the ceiling hasn't been touched.

92.4% Collection2.6 pts below target
Net Collection Rate
92.4%
Target 95% · 2.6 pt gap ≈ $183K annual
Days in AR
47
Target 40 · cash conversion 7 days slow
AR Over 90 Days
18%
Target <15% · aged AR rarely recovers in full
First-Pass Denial Rate
8.7%
Best-in-class <5% · documentation + eligibility
Recoverable Opportunity

Closing the collection gap from 92.4% to 95% is worth roughly $183K annually. The 8.7% denial rate is the operating handle — 99214 documentation issues and preventive-visit eligibility checks drive most of the volume. Workable in months, not years.

04
Capacity

How much you can do.

Unused capacity is the most expensive thing in a clinic. EMG runs at 78% schedule utilization — roughly one in five available appointment slots produced no revenue this year.

78% Utilization12 pts below target
Schedule Utilization
78%
Target 90% · outlying clinics drive the gap
No-Show Rate
12%
Target <8% · Victoria highest at 15%
Lead Time to Next Visit
14 days
Demand exists; capture cadence is slow
Visits per Provider Day
25
At primary care productivity benchmark
Capacity Math

Closing utilization from 78% to 85% across the network represents ~$485K of latent revenue — not from working harder, from capturing demand already present. Friday afternoons at the outlying clinics are the single largest pattern. The fix is operational, not clinical.

05
Value-Based Care

Where the bonuses live.

EMG’s WellMed contract pays meaningful annual bonuses against MLR score and patient star rating. The current tier is producing $600K. The top tier produces $1.5M.

$600K Current$1.5M target · $900K gap
WellMed Bonus Structure · Annual
Current Run-Rate
$600K
at 79 MLR · 4.3 patient stars
Gap on Table
$900K
unrecognized annual upside
Maximum Tier
$1.5M
at 90 MLR · 5.0 patient stars
MLR Score
79 / 100
Target 90 · 11 pts to top bonus tier
WellMed Star Rating
4.3 / 5
Target 5.0 · CAHPS & HEDIS-driven
Attributed MA Lives
1,840
▲ 4.2% YoY · ~30% of total panel
Projected Annual Bonus
$600K
vs $1.5M at top tier · $900K upside
MLR score & star rating · trailing four quarters
Quarterly · WellMed Reporting
Owner Implication

The $900K bonus gap is the highest-leverage single opportunity in this report. MLR moves with documentation accuracy and care coordination. Stars move with the same operational consistency that improves utilization, no-show, and patient experience already discussed here. The four prior engines and this one are not separate stories. They are the same story, from a different angle.

06
Owner Engine

What this is all worth to you.

Every prior section is operating math. This section is owner math — the same dollars, measured by what they return to the person who built the practice and bears the risk.

$108/hr Today$256/hr optimized
Effective Hourly Rate
$108/hr
owner take-home per working hour today
Optimized Hourly Rate
$256/hr
if the five operating gaps in this report close
Practice Valuation
$4.6M
at 4.4× normalized EBITDA · pre-optimization
Wealth Velocity
20%
owner earnings reinvested productively · target 35%
Owner Time at Risk
58 hrs/wk
clinical + admin + ownership · target <48
Wealth Diversification
12%
wealth held outside the practice · target >40%
The Orchard, not the Basket

A practice returning $1.04M of NOI today with the operating gaps unresolved is not the same practice that returns it with them closed. The question is not what it’s worth on the open market today — it is how much fruit it produces, indefinitely, and whether the orchard’s health is improving year over year.

GVFO Operating Philosophy
The Compounding Math

Closing the five gaps in this report is worth approximately $2.4M of incremental annual NOI — expense discipline, collection recovery, capacity capture, and the WellMed bonus tier combined. At a 4.4× multiple, that’s $10.5M of additional practice value — more than tripling today’s figure without acquiring a single new patient.

GVPM Analysis · Illustrative
07
By Location

Five clinics. One operating standard.

Corpus locations lead on every metric. The spread is the network’s clearest standardization opportunity. Click any location for the full operating detail.

What Comes Next

Ready to capture
the gap?

Six engines, one practice. The work isn’t building something new — it’s pulling what’s already running into a tighter operating standard. We’d like to do that with you.

Schedule a Strategy Review →
Annual NOI Upside
~$2.4M
Valuation Impact
~$10.5M
Time Horizon
12 – 18 Months
GVPM
Location Detail · Elizondo Medical Group

Location Name
subtitle here.

Deck text here.

Practice-Level Metrics

Value-Based Care performance (MLR score, WellMed bonus, MA lives) and Owner Engine economics (effective hourly rate, valuation, wealth velocity) are measured at the practice level and not broken out per location.